Our differentiator
MULTI
Multi-method approach
An anomaly seen by one method is a hypothesis. Seen by two, it becomes information.
Why cross methods.
Each method measures a different physical quantity, so each has its blind spots. Resistivity sees a contrast without saying whether it is void or metal. Magnetometry sees iron without giving its depth. Radar gives geometry but saturates in clay.
The method is not chosen in advance: it is fitted to the context, the objectives and the constraints of the site. That judgement — and the ability to combine — is our principal differentiator, more so than the instruments themselves.
-
Resistivity + GPR
Anomaly confirmed and geometried
-
Magnetometry + EM
Metal identified and characterised
-
Resistivity + EM
Surface and depth both covered
-
Strategy chosen
After analysing the context
What crossing adds.
- Interpretation ambiguity removed
- Void, metal and texture change told apart
- Structures of different ages and natures separated
- Depths corroborated by two independent measurements
- Risk reduced before drilling or excavation
Where we use it.
Wherever the stakes justify resolving the doubt rather than documenting it.
A doubt to resolve?
Describe the question. We will tell you which methods answer it, and why.